|
Contents
Resolution on Women and Science by the European Parliament
Personalities: Jenny Whittal
Ethnic Minorities in Construction in Britain: Exclusion or Inclusion
by Clara H. Greed
Resolution on Women and Science
03/02/2000 - EP VOTE 1st READING
The European Parliament approved a resolution on women and
science drafted by Mrs. E. McNALLY (PES, UK).
The Resolution welcomes the Commission's proposal to
increase the involvement of women in programmes organised by the EU and
supports the strategy of research by, for and on women as being
comprehensive and constructive. It approves the aim of collating a more
comprehensive set of statistics on the involvement of women in different
fields of science and research and supports the Commission's efforts to
produce comparable data. It calls for gender-impact studies on the
implementation of the Fifth Framework Programme to be taken into account
when the Sixth Framework Programme is being drawn up so as to ensure that
research topics of special interest to women are given due priority. It also
calls for the appointment of a large percentage of women to serve on
committees that set policies, select and evaluate projects and control funds
at both EU and Member State levels.
It calls on the Member States:
-
to improve the balance between men and women when they
nominate such national experts and committee members;
-
when granting aid, to ensure that the award criteria are
clear and that grants are made in condi-tions of the greatest possible
transparency;
-
to take measures which support the dissociation of
attitudes to course selection from traditional gender specific role
models.
Among other things, it calls on the Commission:
-
to investigate the reasons for the discrepancy between
the number of women graduating in sci-entific disciplines and the number
who are successful in obtaining professional posts;
-
to promote the need for greater levels of numeracy,
statistical and IT training;
-
to avoid where possible and to combat when necessary,
the unjustified positive discrimination in favour of boys in educational
and scientific policy with regard to both the world of work and higher
education;
-
to facilitate mentoring systems within networks of women
scientists;
-
to observe 'International Women's University of
Technology and Culture' to be held as part of the Hanover Expo 2000.
Lastly, it invites the Commission to consider setting up a
properly resources group with responsibility for monitoring the
effectiveness of mainstreaming in the work of each DG and for addressing the
under-representation of women.
25/11/1999 - DECISION OF COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE
The committee adopted the report by Eryl McNALLY (PES, UK)
on the Commission communication "Women and science - Mobilising women
to enrich European research" (consultation procedure). The report
welcomed the Commission proposal, the aims and objectives of which it
supported. It endorsed in particular the broad definition of
"science" adopted by the Commission, the idea of compiling
statistics on the involvement of women in different fields of science and
research through closer cooperation between the Member States and the
proposal to ensure greater representation of women at both EU and Member
State levels on committees that set policies, select and evaluate projects
and control funds (in particular it backed the Commission's aim of ensuring
that at least 40% of those participating in European Research Forums,
advisory groups, assessment and monitoring panels are women). The report
also called for the establishment at European level of a data-base of female
experts to publicise the scientific expertise of women. It asked the
Commission and Member States to cooperate in the compilation of better
statistics to help ensure a large attendance at the conferences planned for
May 2000 (with national civil servants) and May 2001 (with women
scientists). The report was critical of the obstacles in the education and
training system that girls aged 16 and over and women have to surmount
before entering the world of science and technology. To deal with this the
Commission should take steps to combat the existing positive discrimination
in favour of boys in educational and scientific policy with regard to both
the world of work and higher education. Lastly, the report called on
networks of women scientists to become better involved in the
decision-making and policy-making process, at both EU and Member State
level.
17/02/1999 - INITIAL PROPOSAL
PURPOSE: to mobilise women to enrich European research and
to describe what action has and will be taken by the Commission in the field
of research and technological development in order to achieve this
objective.
CONTENT: the European Union at the service of its citizens
must, in line with its general principles, set itself objectives regarding
equal opportunities for men and women in the field of scientific re-search.
Women are currently under-represented in this field: the aim is therefore to
encourage women to take part in European research. Efforts will have to be
made at European and Member State level in order to rectify this situation.
As part of its information policy, the Commission will also seek to ensure
that women are informed about the schemes and programmes intended to
increase their participation in scientific research. The Commission
undertakes to make significant efforts to increase women's participation in
Community research programmes; the overall objective is to achieve for women
at least 40% representation, on average throughout the 5thFramework
Programme, in Marie Curie scholarships, advisory groups and assessment
panels.
Accordingly, the Commission undertakes to pursue two
objectives:
-
to stimulate discussion and the sharing of experience in
this field among the Member States so that action can be taken as
effectively as possible at all levels of power;
-
to develop a coherent approach towards promoting women
in research financed by the Union, with the aim of significantly
increasing the number of women involved in research during the period of
the Fifth Framework Programme.
The purpose of this communication is to describe what action
has been and will be taken by the Commission in the field of research and
technological development to achieve these two objectives, presenting it
against the more general background of the European Union's policy on equal
opportunities, on the one hand, and the action taken in the Member States,
on the other. It should be noted that a very wide range of measures has been
introduced at Member State level. Accordingly, action has been taken by the
Commission.
For instance:
-
discussion and sharing experience: a group of experts ,
a group of national civil servants and a network of women scientists;
-
a coherent approach within the Fifth Framework Programme;
-
a coordinating structure for implementing the gender and
science watch system within the 5th Framework Programme.
By setting up the various schemes described in this
communication, the Commission is providing increased opportunities for women
to take part in scientific research. However, these efforts will have been
in vain unless all those concerned express their interest by working
together towards this goal. The Commission will assess the measures which
have been taken in accordance with this communication and will report on
them to the European Parliament and the Council.
|
Jenny Whittal completed her BSc in Surveying at
UCT in 1989 and proceeded directly with her Masters degree in
Engineering at the same university. Her thesis investigated the use
of GPS for vertical crustal deformation monitoring for the Lesotho
Highlands Water Project. After graduating with her MSc (Eng) in 1991
Jenny began working for the Cape Town City Council with whom she had
a 4-year bursary commitment. She completed her cadastral articles
and was registered as a Professional Land Surveyor in February 1993.
Jenny also became registered to perform Sectional Title work in
March 1994 and became a Senior Land Surveyor. In July 1996 she left
the City Council of Cape Town to join the Department of Geomatics at
the University of Cape Town as a Senior Lecturer. Jenny had lectured
at the Universities of Natal and UCT and also the Cape Technikon
prior to joining UCT. She currently teaches introductory and
advanced surveying as well as error theory and parametric least
squares. Jenny has also lectured map projections at undergraduate
and post-graduate level and is involved in running the annual camps
for Geomaticians and Civil Engineers during the April and November
vacations.
|
In November 1993 Jenny Whittal was co-opted onto the
Council of the Institute of Professional Land Surveyors of the Western Cape
and in April 1995 was elected vice-president. She held this office till
March 1997 when she was elected President of the Institute, a position she
held until March of 1999 as the first woman President of any of the
Institutes of Land Surveyors in South Africa. Currently Jenny is the chair
of a number of committees of the Institute Council and the immediate Past
President. In addition to the Institute involvement, Jenny serves as the
alternate representative from the University to the Education Advisory
Committee (EAC) of the Professional Land Surveyors and Technical Surveyors
Organisation, she is the Chair of the Screening Sub-committee of the EAC
which assesses applications for membership. Jenny is also a member of the
Standards Generating Body drawing up unit standards for the profession. Jenny
Whittal has been involved in the organisation of many local meetings and
international conferences, including the 1995 FIG/SURVEY 95 conference,
meetings of the Southern African GPS User Group, and the International
Conference on Land Tenure (January 1998).
Jenny's research interests are varied, although
she hopes to specialize in investigating the registration of rights
in land and specifically the non-usage of systems to record formal
rights of expectation to freehold property and the disputes arising
therefrom in Cape Town. Recent work has also been done in analysing
the cost-effectiveness of combined GLONASS/GPS receivers and also in
regional improvement of the EGM96 geoid using GPS and levelling
data. Computer Aided Learning is also a major area of interest as
Jenny believes that interactive inter/intranet material to teach,
monitor, and test students is a powerful aid and offers many
benefits to the learner and also assist in the provision of
introductory courses in geomatics within the southern African
region. Initial research has been performed on recruitment and
retention in Geomatics and particularly on the success of the
marketing strategy employed by the Department since 1999. Marketing
of non-profit, service pro-viding, organisations is challenging and
interesting. Jenny Whittal's personal interests
include surfskiing, mountain climbing, mountain biking, surfing, swimming,
hobiecat sailing, and bird watching. Jenny is married to Hamish Whittal, a
contractor in the LINUX and network administration fields. They have a
daughter, Cara Rebekah born on 13th September 1999, who is providing great
joy and blessing in their lives.
Ethnic Minorities in Construction in Britain:
Exclusion or Inclusion
by Clara H. Greed
Introduction: What is the Problem
This paper discusses the changing composition and culture
of the construction industry with reference to the increased representation
of ethnic minorities within the construction and built environment
professions in Britain. Drawing on recent research (Greed,1997a,
Ismail,1998), it addresses the issues generated both for the industry, and
for the minority individuals therein. Following an explanation of the
conceptual and methodological dimensions of the study, the situation in
education and practice is discussed. Those factors which facilitate or
discourage increased entrance and subsequent progress are highlighted. In
the final part of the paper, change agents are identified which might
transform the situation for the future. In the conclusion the benefits to
the industry of drawing its workforce from a more diverse and representative
range of groups within society - and the changes in management practices
required to harness this potential - are discussed.
Ethnic minorities comprise around 5% of the population of
Britain (CSO,1996), and, (depending on which criteria are used, and taking
into account the fact there are no comprehensive figures) they constitute
around 3% of those employed in the construction industry (CITB,1996). It may
appear therefore, that pro rata, ethnic minorities, are doing quite
well, compared with women, who compose 52% of the population, but constitute
less than 5% of the construction workforce. But, as will be illustrated,
ethnic minority individuals compose far less than 1% of membership of the
professional bodies in construction. Whilst some construction organisations
have welcomed and supported ethnic minority professionals, from the research
it is clear there are problems to be addressed, not least the images and
attitudes held by some within the industry as to the perceived place and
role of minority individuals within the industry.
The study particularly investigated the situation in
civil engineering, construction management and building surveying, which
represent three key aspects of the construction professions, namely design,
management and technology. However, comparisons were made with housing,
architecture and planning. This is because these specialisms have a higher
representation of minority groups than the areas under consideration, and so
it was important to identify why they were seen as more attractive.
Comparisons are also made in the paper, and within the accompanying tables,
in respect of the changing gender, class and age composition of the
industry. For example, Table 1, shows the ethnic composition of first year
undergraduate students across the range of construction professional
specialisms for comparative purposes. Table 2 also shows gender composition,
because around a quarter of all ethnic minority students on built
environment courses are female. Likewise age composition is shown and its
significance, in respect of minority students, is considered later in the
paper. Thus it is considered unrealistic to deal with 'ethnicity' in
isolation within such a diverse society as Britain, in which many factors
are at work determining a person's career (cf Phillips and Phillips,1998).
For example, black women architects strongly believe they should not
rendered invisible in academic work in which, they consider, it is often
assumed that, 'all the women are white, and all the blacks are men' (Hull et
al, 1982; quoted in de Graft-Johnson,1999).
Table 1: Ethnicity
An RICS sample membership survey found in 1995 (these are numbers
not percentages) the following numbers for the professional body: |
In comparison for the Chartered Institute of
Housing for 1996 the figures are as follows as percentage of total
membership: |
Bangladeshi |
10 |
0 % (17 individuals) |
Black African |
214 |
1 % (168) |
Black Caribbean |
79 |
1 % (176) |
Black other |
21 |
1 % (102) |
Chinese |
2320 |
7 % (957) |
Indian |
139 |
1 % (128) |
Pakistani |
234 |
0 % (57) |
Other |
26 |
1 % (153) |
Rest [White] |
|
72 % |
Only the RICS and RTPI gave me figures on disability
which was also clearly seen as another very 'other' category. Injury from
accidents in the construction industry usually often results in workers
leaving the industry, because of disability. It is not part of the culture
of construction to see disability as a reason for taking people on.
As will be seen in the education section of this appendix
in some specialisms ethnic minority students outnumber all women 2 to 1. On
a 'typical' large building site one is more likely to encounter a male Asian
construction professional than a woman of any category. Few ethnic minority
candidates in construction are women, except in housing, where there are
large numbers of women generally. But in Housing (CIOH) women outnumber men
2:1 among ethnic minorities, but this is in part accounted for by larger
contingents of overseas and Chinese categories women. Indeed I found many
professional bodies went in for a touch of sleight of hand of including the
overseas categories to increase the ethnic minority component at student
level, but excluding them 'normally' from the mainstream full membership,
'you don’t want overseas members do you?'. In the harder construction end
of the industry as a whole male ethnic minority individuals appear to
outnumber their women ethnic minorities by at least 3:1, which still makes
it a higher proportion of women than found among the white home population.
Male ethnic minority professionals out in practice often appear to outnumber
women of any category, as I have frequently observed at professional
meetings and workplace situations - although from the statistics one would
expect more women to be visible. Even where women or ethnic minorities are
prominent they are unlikely to be in senior posts.
The RTPI had 571 ethnic minority members (including 180
students) and 71 disabled members in 1994 many of the later also being
retired (elderly) members. The figures for 1997 were a little over 764
(including 164 students) and 100 respectively. As to disabled planning
students the figure still rests at 2 under-graduate and 2 post-graduate
students as it was in my last survey on this in 1994. As can be seen the
RTPI gave a figure for disability, and the only other body to do so was the
RICS gave me two different figures on disability, the latest for 1995 being
1246 disabled members, interestingly both bodies put these figures in with
the ethnicity figures for me. RIBA statistics showed for 1996, that of all
new entrants to architecture courses, 5% were Indian/Pakistani/Bangladeshi;
and 2% Afro-Caribbean, making up a total of 7% of all new entrants to
architecture last year. (RIBA,1997, Education Statistics for 1996/7) but
RIBA were vaguer about those in practice. Not all architectural schools send
back their replies to RIBA as requested on the ethnic origin of their
students, so the figures are by no means accurate, but they give some
indication of the situation.
Several of the engineering and other building and
construction professional bodies were at a complete loss to offer ethnicity
figures but some offered age of regional location instead. Where information
is available it is often unclear 'who' is included in the generic totals,
such as whether 'overseas members' are included, and if Black British
professionals are counted as part of the 'home' UK membership along with
white professionals. If ethnic origin questions are asked, they may be very
general. For example, one finds the codings used vary and often manifest
alarming transglobal combinations covering millions of diverse populations,
such as the popular disaggregated 'Asian' category which includes everyone
from the Middle to Far East, or just 'black'. Another curious 'cultural'
factor is the complete dismissal, 'pretend they don't exist'
mentality towards American construction companies shown by some construction
professionals. As indicated earlier some professional bodies appear confused
as to whether to include overseas national members under 'overseas' or
'ethnic minority' categories. The invisibility of 'nationals' who, globally,
form a large component of the ex-pat dominated 'colonial' construction
industry makes the globe appear 'whiter' and more 'English' than it really
is. Yet, it is still more popular to discuss the problems of 'multi-ethnic'
workers in situations where a range of professionals are working together
from different countries on an international building site, than it is to
discuss the problems of 'ethnic minorities' on British building sites.
Table 2. RPTI Membership 1994 for
Comparison
GRADE |
TOTAL |
FEMALE |
NON-WHITE |
DISABLED |
Fellow |
613 |
20 |
15 |
5 |
Member |
1268 |
2553 |
364 |
35 |
Student |
3094 |
1309 |
180 |
4 |
Legal |
144 |
8 |
- |
- |
Honorary |
63 |
6 |
- |
- |
International |
26 |
8 |
4 |
- |
Retired |
807 |
28 |
8 |
28 |
All |
17435 |
3932 |
571 |
72 |
Source and Categories from RTPI, as presented in Greed,
1994. The non-white is not divided into male and female by the RTPI. Also
note how many of the 'disabled' appear to be elderly retired members.
Table 3: Accepted Candidates in UCAS
Subject Group: Architecture, Building and Planning
Age at 30.9.96 |
Under 21 |
21 to end of 24 |
25 and over |
Total |
Sex |
Male |
Female |
Male |
Female |
Male |
Female |
Male |
Female |
Ethnicity |
Unknown |
179 |
30 |
81 |
14 |
95 |
23 |
355 |
67 |
White |
2967 |
764 |
435 |
56 |
354 |
88 |
3756 |
908 |
Black |
44 |
17 |
20 |
6 |
55 |
25 |
119 |
48 |
Asian |
209 |
55 |
33 |
2 |
17 |
5 |
259 |
62 |
Other |
20 |
11 |
4 |
3 |
12 |
3 |
36 |
17 |
Total |
3419 |
877 |
573 |
81 |
533 |
144 |
4525 |
1102 |
Class |
Unknown |
254 |
57 |
105 |
24 |
145 |
44 |
504 |
125 |
Professional |
530 |
170 |
56 |
6 |
33 |
15 |
619 |
191 |
Intermediate |
1373 |
338 |
150 |
23 |
120 |
42 |
1643 |
403 |
Skilled non manual |
355 |
102 |
50 |
12 |
49 |
27 |
454 |
141 |
Skilled manual |
624 |
140 |
152 |
9 |
141 |
10 |
917 |
159 |
Partly Skilled |
225 |
61 |
46 |
7 |
31 |
5 |
302 |
73 |
Unskilled |
58 |
9 |
14 |
- |
14 |
1 |
86 |
10 |
Total (same) |
3419 |
877 |
573 |
81 |
533 |
144 |
4525 |
1102 |
Adapted from HESA figures, note class is based on
father's occupation
By Clara H. Greed
Faculty of the Built Environment, UWE, Bristol
E-mail: [email protected]
with
Adjmal Ismail (researcher on ethnic minorities in construction management).
Editor: Chair of the Task Force on Under-represented Groups in
Surveying Ms. Gabriele Dasse, Kleinfeld 22a, D-21149 Hamburg,
Germany Email [email protected] Fax
+ 49 40 428 265 265
Tel. + 49 40 428 265 250 web site: http://www.fig.net/figtree/tf/underrep/tfunrep.htm
4/00, month of issue: December
© Copyright 2000 Gabriele Dasse. Permission is
granted to photocopy in limited quantity for educational
purposes. Other requests
to photocopy or otherwise reproduce material in this newsletter should be
addressed to the Editor.
|
|